![]() ![]() ![]() The solicitation specified that a rating of acceptable would be required in all subfactors to be eligible for award, and that an offeror with an unacceptable rating would no longer be considered for award. at 144.įor the technical management factor, the RFP stated that technical proposals would be assessed by assigning a rating of acceptable, reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable, or unacceptable, based on whether the proposal meets the performance work statement requirements and standards for each subfactor. The solicitation stated that the technical evaluation would assess an offerors technical/management capability through the consideration of two subfactors: (1) technical/management capabilities for each of six task orders, and (2) operations task order transition plan. at 3.Īs amended, the RFP stated that multiple awards would be made to a target of eight of the lowest-priced, technically acceptable offers that have a past performance rating of satisfactory confidence or higher. The RFP also contemplated the issuance of the first task order-operations task order 0001-to a single ID/IQ contract holder in conjunction with the ID/IQ award. The solicitation, issued on May 3, 2012, as a competitive set-aside under the Small Business Administration 8(a) program, anticipated the award of multiple ID/IQ contracts with fixed-price, cost plus fixed-fee, time and materials, and cost reimbursable contract line item numbers (CLINs), for a base year and four 1-year options. The protesters argue that the agency improperly found their proposals technically unacceptable and ineligible for award. HC1047-12-R-4013 for information technology enterprise support services. Louis, Missouri, and NOVA Corporation, of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, by the Department of Defense, Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) under request for proposals (RFP) No. IP Network Solutions, Inc., of Herndon, Virginia, Emagine IT, Inc., of Fairfax, Virginia, and EnterpriseTech Joint Venture, LLC, of McLean, Virginia, protest the award of four indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) contracts to High Action, LLC, of Fairfax, Virginia, Soft Tech Consulting, Inc., of Chantilly, Virginia, Unitech Consulting, LLC d/b/a/ Chameleon Integrated Services, of St. Protests arguing that the agency applied an undisclosed and unreasonable staffing estimate in evaluating proposals are denied where the agency reasonably used the staffing estimates contained in its independent government estimate as a tool to evaluate technical proposals, and took into account each offerors particular technical approach. Kang, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DeBose, Esq., Department of Defense, Defense Information Systems Agency, for the agency. Rhodes, Esq., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, for Chameleon Integrated Services, an intervenor. Mullins, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for EnterpriseTech Joint Venture, LLC, the protesters. Mateer, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, for Emagine IT, Inc. Shook PLLC, for IP Network Solutions, Inc. Shook, Esq., The Law Offices of William A. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |